@article{Anggraeni_Ardiansyah_Sa’adah_Sudrajat_2025, title={Menjembatani Barat Dan Timur: Implementasi Prinsip Ham Universal Dalam Yuriprudensi Islam Kontemporer}, volume={7}, url={https://ojs.ejournalunigoro.com/JUSTITIABLE/article/view/1141}, DOI={10.56071/justitiable.v7i2.1141}, abstractNote={<p>The intersection between universal Human Rights (HAM) and Islamic law has<br>been an interesting topic of discussion in recent decades. Human Rights (HAM)<br>were declared in 1948 by the United Nations (UN) General Assembly. Human<br>Rights have become a reference for the international world and influence all<br>aspects of contemporary international relations and law. However, the<br>interpretation and application of human rights in the national scope are not as<br>smooth as their acceptance. The clash between local culture and law with<br>universal human rights is often unavoidable. Islamic law is a product of Islamic<br>Sharia which is officially implemented in almost all Muslim countries which are<br>also members of the UN. Is there a clash between international human rights law and Islamic law and how to resolve it? This paper aims to bridge the gap between<br>these two systems by analyzing the implementation of human rights principles in<br>contemporary Islamic jurisprudence. Despite differences in historical<br>development and sources of authority, both human rights and Islamic law have<br>the same goal, namely to protect human dignity and basic rights. This study will<br>examine the similarities in values, differences in interpretation, and efforts that<br>have been made to harmonize these two systems. In addition, this paper will also<br>identify the challenges faced in the harmonization process, and recommend some<br>recommendations for the future.</p>}, number={2}, journal={JUSTITIABLE - Jurnal Hukum}, author={Anggraeni, Meri and Ardiansyah, Ahmad and Sa’adah, Maura Rofiqoh and Sudrajat, Shinta Azzahra}, year={2025}, month={Feb.}, pages={148–155} }